Senin, 25 April 2016

BHS Nears Collapse Putting 11,000 Jobs At Risk


Retailer BHS is understood to be calling in adminstrators, threatening up to 11,000 jobs across the UK.

A statement is expected to be made later about the company's future.

Sky's City Editor Mark Kleinman said: "BHS has been struggling for many years. It was sold by the high street billionaire Sir Philip Green for £1 last year to a group of little-known financiers through a group called Retail Acquisitions.

"A few weeks back it looked like they had secured a urgent lifeline by getting approval from landlords and other creditors to reduce its rent bill at its more than 160 stores.   

"But a separate £60m loan that the company required has failed to materialise."

Sports Direct has been in talks to buy some of the stores, but there are reports it does not want to take on the company's pensions deficit.

David Gill, national officer of shopworkers' union USDAW, said he was "very concerned" about the situation at the retailer.

"We are seeking urgent clarification from the company and urging them to change their attitude to trade unions and begin a dialogue with us at this difficult and worrying time for staff.

"We also urge the company to comply with the law, consult staff and USDAW as the union for BHS workers on the future of the business. I am writing to members working in BHS to reassure them that we will provide the support, advice and representation they require."

BHS could be the biggest retailer to collapse since Woolworths disappeared in 2008 and that is likely to raise questions about the company's financial stewardship and the role of its directors.

Although one of the UK's most recognised high street brands, BHS has struggled against value fashion rivals and online shopping.

It performs on average 1,000,000 transactions a week across 164 stores and 74 franchise stores across 18 countries - but has struggled to be profitable.

Carlyle Backs Diamond's Barclays Africa Bid



One of the world's most powerful buyout firms is backing a daring attempt by Bob Diamond, the former Barclays chief executive, to swoop on the lender's African operations.

Sky News has learnt that The Carlyle Group, which owns household name companies in the UK such as Addison Lee, is working with one of Mr Diamond's investment vehicles on a bid for Barclays Africa Group Limited (BAGL).

The news will underline the former Barclays chief's efforts to win control of the operations he helped to build during his long career with the bank.

His plans remain, however, at a relatively early stage, and no firm proposal has yet been made to the board of Barclays, according to insiders.

Mr Diamond's proposal is being hatched through Atlas Merchant Capital, which was established in 2013 "to participate in compelling market opportunities in the financial services sector".

That move came a year after Mr Diamond left Barclays shortly after it had been fined nearly £300m by regulators in the UK and US for its role in the global Libor rate-rigging scandal.

Jes Staley, Barclays' new chief executive, said in March that the bank would seek to reduce its 62.3% stake in BAGL, which has majority stakes in banks in Botswana, Ghana, Kenya, Mauritius, Mozambique, Seychelles, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia - making it one of the continent's largest banking groups.

It also has representative offices in Namibia and Nigeria, as well as insurance operations in Botswana, Mozambique, South Africa and Zambia.

Mr Staley's decision to offload most of its shareholding has angered some investors, who say privately that it should instead be focusing on getting out of investment banking, where it has struggled for years to generate acceptable returns.

Barclays will hold its annual meeting in London this week, where it will avoid the traditional protests from institutional investors over the size of its bonus pot but is nevertheless likely to be scrutinised over key strategic decisions including the proposed African sale.

The bank has already warned in recent weeks that - along with Wall Street rivals which have reported dire first-quarter results - a slowdown in trading and advisory income in its investment bank is hurting it.

It has also infuriated investors by slashing its dividend for the next two years despite indications from John McFarlane, Barclays' chairman, that it would seek to grow the payout.

Mr Staley has defended his decision to reduce its African stake to a minority position, saying that it would allow the bank "to deconsolidate (BAGL) from an accounting and regulatory perspective, subject to shareholder and regulatory approvals if and as required".

Mr Diamond's determination to gain control of BAGL, which has a market value in Johannesburg equivalent to nearly £6bn, has seen him turn to one of the world's most formidable investors for support.

Carlyle, which reports its own quarterly results to Wall Street this week, manages more than $180bn (£125bn) in assets, although it has a relatively limited presence in Africa.

Through Atlas Mara, another vehicle created by Mr Diamond, the former Barclays chief has established a presence in seven African countries, including Botswana, Nigeria and Rwanda.

It is unclear how a proposal from Atlas Merchant Capital and Carlyle would be structured.

Other investors are also said to be in discussions with Mr Diamond's veh
icle.

A spokesman for Mr Diamond and Carlyle both declined to comment on Sunday.

Senin, 11 April 2016

Taxpayer May Take Port Talbot Steel Stake


The taxpayer could co-invest with a buyer to save the Port Talbot steelworks, the Business Secretary has told MPs.

Sajid Javid made his comments after the current owner, Tata Steel, confirmed it was contacting "many tens" of potential buyers for the South Wales site - adding that it would prefer one buyer.

Earlier on Monday, the company said it was selling its Long Products steel business to Greybull Capital, potentially saving over 4,000 jobs at a number of sites in the UK and France.

Commenting on the battle to save Port Talbot, Mr Javid told the Commons a part-renationalisation was possible: "The formal sales process begins today.

"I've been in contact with potential buyers making clear that the Government stands ready to help.

"This includes looking at the possibility of co-investing with a buyer on commercial terms."

He explained that Tata had told him several weeks ago, in confidence, that it was considering the immediate closure of Port Talbot but he was "not prepared to let that happen".

To jeers from opposition MPs, who expressed anger over his decision to visit Australia at the time of Tata's decision to sell, he added: "In the days that followed I worked relentlessly to convince Tata that it was in everyone's interest to keep the plant open and to find a new buyer.

"I also made it very clear that the Government is totally committed to supporting and facilitating that process. This work has paid off."

Responding to his comments, the head of the Community steel union said he was encouraged.

Roy Rickhuss said: "Mr Javid should bring forward further details of what ‘co-investment’ would look like and share his plans with the unions so we can ensure that the best interests of steelworkers are upheld.

"There are still many steps to be taken and yet again we call on the government to match the rhetoric of its ministers with action and to continue to work with the Community to save our steel."

The only company that has so far expressed a public interest in buying the rest of the Tata Steel assets remaining in the UK is Liberty, owned by Sanjeev Gupta, though others are known to be examining their positions.

Mr Gupta has spoken of a desire to save jobs with the potential to remodel Port Talbot as a producer of steel through the use of electric arc furnaces - to take advantage of recycling opportunities.

But top of his list of concerns are high energy costs, which he told Sky News last week would have to be "rectified" by the Government.

He also warned there would be no quick-fix, overnight solution.

Tata Sells Scunthorpe Steel Plant To Greybull


Tata has sold its steel plant in Scunthorpe and several other businesses to Greybull Capital, possibly saving up to 4,400 jobs in the UK and 400 in France.

Greybull will take on the entirety of Tata Steel UK's steelworks operations in Scunthorpe, as well as two mills in Teesside, an engineering workshop in Workington and a design consultancy in York along with a mill in Hayange, France.

The combined operations form Tata's Long Products Europe (LPE) business. Following completion of the deal, the steelworks business will trade under the brand name British Steel.

The sale also includes the associated sales and distribution network.

Tata also confirmed on Monday that it was to contact "many tens" of potential buyers for the rest of its UK steel business, including the sprawling Port Talbot works - adding that it preferred to find a single purchaser.

Commenting on the creation of British Steel arising from the Long Products sale Roy Rickhuss, general secretary of the steelworkers’ union Community, said: "We welcome this major step forward towards a deal which will continue steelmaking in Scunthorpe and secure the future of the Long Products business across the UK.

"Greybull's interest in the business ... demonstrates that with the right investors UK steel making can have a positive future. So far, Tata Steel has honoured its commitment to be a responsible seller of the business by allowing time for the deal to be done."

Union members at Scunthorpe are currently being balloted on whether to accept a 3% cut in pay and reductions in pension contributions for a year to smooth the path for the deal.

Greybull, which is a British-based investment group, will pay a nominal £1 for the business and has arranged a £400m investment and financing package. 

The existing management team will stay on to run the new business, and try to return the company to profitability.

Marc Meyohas, a partner at Greybull, said the aim was to avoid any redundancies, grow the business and become profitable within a year.

"We are delighted to have reached agreement for the acquisition of LPE, which we believe can become a strong business, with a highly skilled workforce and great potential."

The deal is expected to complete within eight weeks, assuming the completion of the financing arrangements for LPE and contract agreements with key suppliers are agreed.

Hans Fischer, chief executive of Tata Steel’s European operations, said: “Under these current challenging market conditions in Europe with the soaring levels of imports from China, we are happy that Tata Steel UK and Greybull Capital have entered the final stage of completion of the sale."

Greybull said it is already searching for a permanent chief executive.

The company helped turn-around the airline operator Monarch, which it bought it in 2014 and last year returned to profit, and recently acquired convenience store chain, My Local, from Morrisons.

Mr Meyohas would not confirm whether Greybull was interested in buying other parts of Tata's UK assets, such as the Port Talbot plant.

"We are always interested in growth. We would review any opportunities as and when they are presented to us," he said.

The Business Secretary Sajid Javid said: "The UK and Welsh Governments are working tirelessly to support Tata Steel to reach a deal for Port Talbot and their other sites across the UK."

Kamis, 07 April 2016

New M&S Boss: Clothing Sales 'Unsatisfactory'


The new boss of Marks and Spencer has ordered a turnaround of its clothing business, describing sales as "unsatisfactory".

Steve Rowe said he would update investors on his plans next month after the retailer reported a 2.7% dip in like-for-like sales in its clothing and home sales during its fourth quarter.

He is retaining direct control over the troubled division - given its problems in recent years - despite taking over as group chief executive from Marc Bolland just days ago.

M&S blamed the performance on price deflation creating a "challenging backdrop" for trade but it admitted "some investment in price" in a bid to bolster its offering.

The figures also benefited from an earlier Easter, handing a 0.4% boost to clothing and home sales and a 1% rise in food.

Mr Rowe said that while he was happy with growing market share in its food division, he would be focusing on growing sales in clothing.

"I am very proud and privileged to be leading M&S.  We are focused on getting even closer to our customers and putting them at the heart of everything we do.

"We had a mixed performance in the final quarter of the year. Our food business once again outperformed the market ...Although the sales decline in clothing and home was lower than last quarter, our performance remains unsatisfactory and there is still more we need to do.

"Turning around our clothing and home business by improving our customer offer is our number one priority.

"I will update you on my thoughts on the business in May," he concluded.

According to a memo sent by Mr Rowe on Monday, he told staff M&S's "number one priority" would be to improve the perennially under-performing clothing and homewares division, which has seen same-store sales decline in all but one of the last 18 quarters.

The new boss vowed that M&S would spend time listening to customers and "keeping things simple", saying that the company was guilty of "over-complicating" things - a remark which one City analyst interpreted as a veiled dig at his predecessor.

Mr Bolland announced that he was leaving in January after five turbulent years in charge, with margin improvements in its clothing business undermined by persistent problems in technology and logistics combined with a disappointing customer response to many of its fashion ranges.

Fed Still Cautious Of Further US Rate Rises


The Federal Reserve committee is maintaining a slow and steady approach to raising interest rates, according to the minutes of a meeting held in March which were published on Wednesday.

Some had anticipated that strong employment and spending figures may encourage policymakers to boost rates earlier than expected due to the risk of a surge in prices.

But this appears not to be the case, despite two officials calling for an increase to have taken place last month.

The documents suggested that the Fed will stick with its plan to increase rates just twice this year, rather than the four hikes they had initially intended.

The downward revision came last month in response to concerns over the instability of the global markets, particularly due to the weakening of the Chinese economy.

According to the published minutes a number of central figures on the committee disagreed with an immediate rate hike, citing the continuing elevated risks to the US economy.

They indicated that they felt an increase in interest rates even this month, in April, would ‘signal a sense of urgency that they did not think appropriate’.

The Federal Reserve first hiked rates in December 2015, increasing them by a quarter of a percentage point.

They had been holding a rate of almost zero for seven years, since the beginning of the global financial crisis.

The US markets responded to the news by failing slightly after having risen fairly steadily throughout the day, highlighting their continued nervousness about the impact that rising rates too quickly might have on growth.

The S&P 500 Index shed over six points from its peak to 2053.86 in the immediate aftermath of the announcement and the Dow Jones dropped by 60 points to 17621.75, while the Nasdaq Index was down 10 points to 4511.51.

However all three recovered within the hour and quickly made further gains.

While employment and wages have been making gains in recent months not all indicators have been enjoying the same success.

Manufacturing figures for the first quarter of this year – published on Monday – showed that business spending on capital goods was much weaker than originally thought, indicating a further decline in the growth of the economy.

Senin, 04 April 2016

Everything You Need To Know About Flood Re


A new scheme to help home-owners in flood-stricken areas reduce their insurance premiums launches today, but what exactly is Flood Re? Here's a handy guide.

:: What is Flood Re?

A scheme run jointly by the Government and the insurance industry. The aim is to make insurance more affordable for those living in areas with a high risk of flooding, where insurance premiums are likely to be higher.

The higher cost associated with flood-risk areas is passed on to Flood Re, meaning insurance companies don't have to foot the bill, and should offer cheaper policies to those affected.

Essentially it is a reinsurance company, which allows insurers to insure themselves against losses because of flooding.

It’s not-for-profit, owned and managed by the insurance industry, and is the first of its kind in the world.

:: How does it work?

It is up to the insurer to decide if they wish to take part in Flood Re and pass on the flood-risk element of cover to Flood Re.

If they do want to pass on the flood-risk, insurers will pay a fixed charge per policy.

Issuance companies will also contribute to an annual £180m fund; the levy is raised from all UK home insurers according to their market share.

:: How is it calculated?

The cost for insurers to pass on the flood-risk to Flood Re is calculated according to the council tax band of the house. It starts at £210 for a Band A house, going up to £1,200 for Band H homes.

Flood Re doesn't set prices for home insurance, that is still set by the insurance company.

:: Who is eligible?

Only residential properties in council tax band A to H are covered. Businesses and buy-to-let properties are ineligible.

The holder of the insurance policy, or their immediate family, must be living in the property.

Flats in leasehold blocks of more than four are also excluded.

The property must have been built before 1 January 2009 to prevent incentivising building on flood-risk areas.

The Association of British Insurers (ABI) estimates some 350,000 properties in the UK will be eligible.

:: What do you have to do?

Buy your insurance cover as normal. You will need to check with your insurer if you're eligible and if they offer Flood Re products.

You will make claims through your insurer as before, and won't deal directly with Flood Re.

:: Who's taking part?

The following insurance brands offer insurance products that include the benefits of Flood Re: Admiral, Avantia (HomeProtect), Aviva Home Insurance, Bank of Scotland, Cherish insurance Brokers, Churchill, Direct Line, First Direct Home Insurance, Halifax, Hiscox Broker, Legal & General, HSBC Home Insurance, Liverpool Victoria, Lloyds bank, More Than, Nationwide and Privilege.

:: Is it fair?

Insurance companies are expected to pass on the cost of the Flood Re levy to their customers, which could raise average bills by around £10.50.

The scheme means those in lower-risk areas are helping to subside those in higher-risk places, where the premiums have been capped at an artificially low rate.

The Committee on Climate Change has said the scheme is not good value for money, specifically that it is subsidising more households than needed, meaning “costs are higher than necessary at the expense of other households’ insurance bills.”

The CCC has called for the exclusion of band H houses, which, it says, are not likely to struggle to cover the cost of insurance. Band H homes were initially excluded from the scheme, but Flood Re argue "the impact of a flood can be no less devastating for Band H homes".

BT Fury At Ministers' 'Radical' Ofcom Call


The chief executive of BT Group has accused ministers of failing to acknowledge its efforts to overhaul Britain's broadband infrastructure as regulators mull tougher oversight of the former state monopoly.

Sky News has learnt that Gavin Patterson wrote to John Whittingdale, the Culture Secretary, last week in the wake of the Government's response to Ofcom's digital communications review.

Published on Wednesday, the Government said it "believes Ofcom should be firmly focused on taking whatever action is needed to correct the competition problems identified, and to promote the growth of the digital economy, however radical a change that might be".

It added that Ofcom should "confirm a clear and speedy timetable for decision-taking on the necessary changes to resolve the issues identified".

Mr Patterson is said to have been irritated by the Government's response, prompting him to write to Mr Whittingdale to argue that ministers had not taken account of a promised investment in improvements to its broadband network, which is also used by BT's competitors.

His letter added that the Government had not recognised in its response BT's planned introduction later this year of G.Fast, an upgrade to its existing copper network.

BT has said it will invest at least £1bn in delivering ultrafast broadband if it gains regulatory certainty over its ownership of Openreach, its infrastructure arm which rivals have demanded should be spun off.

Sky plc, the owner of Sky News, TalkTalk and Vodafone have argued that Openreach's continued ownership by BT represents a conflict of interest because it reduces its incentive to invest in upgrading its infrastructure.

Vodafone has accused BT of engaging in a game of "intellectual hide-and-seek", saying in a regulatory submission that it loads Openreach with "inappropriate costs from other parts of its business, which it expects to be paid for by the rest of the industry and passed on to customers".

BT has denied those suggestions.

The Government's response to Ofcom's review said it agreed that "the current relationship between BT and Openreach will not deliver the country’s needs for more competition, better innovation and better service".

Mr Patterson's letter to the Culture Secretary comes at an important time for BT, which is implementing a new organisational structure in the wake of its £11bn takeover of EE, the mobile phone group.

It has also appointed a new finance director, Simon Lowth, to replace veteran finance chief Tony Chanmugam.

BT, which competes for telecoms, broadband and pay-television customers with Sky, has a market value of nearly £44bn.

The company declined to comment on Monday.

Minggu, 03 April 2016

Tesla Unveils Mass Market Electric Car Model


Electric car maker Tesla has unveiled its new, cheaper mass market model and revealed it had already taken 130,000 orders even though it is more than a year away from production.

Enthusiasts had queued overnight outside Tesla stores in California to put down deposits on the car, which will sell for $35,000 (£24,000), half the price of its current models, the Model S and the Model X, which start at $70,000 (£49,000).

Chief executive Elon Musk said it was the final step In the company’s plan to develop a "mass market, affordable car".

It is expected to have a range of more than 200 miles on an electric charge - around double what drivers currently get from competitors it is price range. Features will include automatic lane-changing.

Tesla is aiming to lift its car production to 500,000 by 2020, up from 50,000 last year.

It also plans to double the number of stores it has worldwide to 441 by the end of 2017.

Mr Musk unveiled a prototype of the Model 3 Sedan in Hawthorne, California, outside Los Angeles at an event attended by hundreds of Tesla owners and media.

Three of the cars were driven on stage. The four-door vehicles have no grille and also feature a roof that is a panoramic pane of glass from front to back.

The Model 3 is seen as critical to Tesla's growth plans and sustaining its share price which has jumped in recent days ahead of the launch, amid concerns by some sceptics about when the business will start to turn a profit.

A rival electric car from General Motors, the Chevrolet Bolt, is to launch later this year at a starting price of around $35,000 while a new generation of Nissan’s Leaf electric car is also in the offing.

Fears Over Sluggish Growth In Manufacturing


British manufacturing has grown slightly from a three-year low but exports and jobs continued to show a decline, figures show.

The closely-watched Markit/CIPS manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) edged up to 51.0 in March, following February's 50.8 reading, completing one of its weakest quarters in the past three years.

A measure above 50 marks industry growth, while a number below 50 shows contraction.

The survey said the main source of new business was in the domestic market while exports shrank for the third consecutive month, hampered by a tough global environment.

Employment showed a worsening decline. While smaller businesses were hiring, this was offset by cuts at larger manufacturers.

It was the latest mediocre update from a sector which is still lagging below its pre-recession levels and comes as industry faces fresh uncertainty after Tata Steel said it planned a sale of its entire UK operation. 

Rob Dobson, senior economist at Markit, said: "Although March saw modest improvements in the trends for production and new orders, industry is still hovering close to the stagnation mark and will struggle to make a meaningful contribution to the next set of GDP growth figures".

Howard Archer, chief UK and European economist at IHS Global Insight, said: "About the best that can be said for this survey is that it is a tiny step in the right direction for manufacturers."

Ruth Miller, UK economist at Capital Economics, said the "dismal" figures "suggest that the sector is still struggling to put its troubles last year behind it".

There are expectations that manufacturing prospects will improve during the year, however, with global growth expected to pick up slightly but there are still uncertainties due to the upcoming EU referendum and its effect on the exchange rate, she added.

Separate manufacturing PMI figures for the eurozone showed a reading of 51.6 - up from February's 51.2.

The bloc's economy grew by just 1.6% in 2015 and first-quarter surveys suggest there is unlikely to be much short-term improvement.

Jumat, 01 April 2016

Argos Owner Backs £1.4bn Sainsbury's Takeover


The board of Argos owner Home Retail Group has agreed to support a takeover by Sainsbury's in a £1.4bn deal - raising the prospect of job losses if hundreds of Argos branches close.

It comes after the supermarket won a takeover battle with South Africa's Steinhoff, which withdrew from its attempt to buy the retailer two weeks ago.

The tie-up will create a £6bn non-food operation, putting the new business in the same league as John Lewis and Marks & Spencer and also taking on Amazon.

But Sainsbury's has said it plans to relocate many Argos stores within under-occupied space in its supermarkets, threatening the closure of up to 200 sites.

Argos currently has 845 stores and employs 30,000 people. It notched up sales of more than £4bn for the year to the end of February.

Sainsbury's has not confirmed the number of sites that will close but says that after the takeover there will be more than 2,000 sites including concessions within and "click and collect" points as well as stores.

The deal is expected to deliver annual savings of £160m - likely to result in job cuts though details are yet to be confirmed.

The latest announcement said rolling out concessions within Sainsbury's stores would "increase the attractiveness of these locations".

Around 55% of these concessions will be relocated Argos stores, with half of these moving less than a mile.

The cash-and-shares takeover deal, when including a £200m pay-out to Home Retail Group shareholders, values the company at around £1.4bn.

It is conditional on approval by shareholders and regulators and is expected to complete in the third quarter of this year.

Sainsbury's said it was "making good progress" amid the ongoing supermarket price war against major rivals Tesco, Asda and Morrisons.

Now it wants to accelerate its efforts to cash in on the high level of customer visits to its stores "to compete across a broad range of products and services, beyond its food heritage".

Sainsbury's chairman David Tyler said: "The combined business will offer a multiproduct, multi-channel proposition, with fast delivery networks, which we believe will be very attractive to customers and which will create value to both sets of shareholders."

The deal comes after Home Retail Group agreed to sell its DIY business, Homebase, to Australian firm Wesfarmers fo £340m.

Co-op Bank Losses More Than Double To £611m


The Co-operative Bank slumped to a £611m loss last year amid a turnaround plan that saw it slash 1,000 jobs and shut dozens of branches - with more closures to come.

Its 2015 loss - more than double the £264m shortfall in 2014 - was blamed on "issues of the past" as the bank said its core performance improved and it stemmed an exodus of customer account holders.

Chief executive Niall Booker saw his total pay package surge by 25% to £3.85m, boosted by long-term incentive awards.

Meanwhile, job numbers fell by 1,012, or 18%, to 4,470 as 58 branches were closed amid efforts to cut costs. A further 54 branch closures are planned in 2016.

The lender's bottom line was hit as it took an extra charge of £72m for the payment protection insurance (PPI) mis-selling scandal as well as costs of about £99m relating to breaches of consumer credit rules.

Total "conduct and legal risk" charges were £193.7m, 91% up on the previous year, the bank said. It expects to continue to make losses this year and next.

Meanwhile part of the lender's business plan has, as earlier revealed by Sky News, been re-submitted to the Bank of England's Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) - and approved - after it scaled back its withdrawal from some "non-core" loans.

Mr Booker said during the year the bank had boosted its capital, reduced costs and strengthened its core business.

He added: "The expected widening of our financial loss compared with 2014, due to legacy issues we have known about and highlighted for some time, should not distract from the considerable progress made in turning the Bank around."

The overall number of current accounts at the lender at the end of the year was just over 1.4 million, a net fall of 799, compared to the year before. But it compared to a fall of 66,340 in 2014.

Past scandals and financial woes had been blamed for the previous customer exodus.

The lender was nearly sunk when a £1.5bn hole in its balance sheet emerged in 2013 after the disastrous takeover of the Britannia building society and the aborted plan to swallow up more than 600 branches from Lloyds Banking Group.

It resulted in the wider Co-operative group's 100% hold of the bank shrinking to 20% with four-fifths of the business now owned mainly by US hedge funds.

The lender has also faced tough regulatory scrutiny, failing a bank stress test last year.

In addition, it was tarnished by a drugs scandal involving former chairman Paul Flowers - whose financial competence was questioned by MPs.

Senin, 28 Maret 2016

Pru To Impose Pay Cap After M&G Jackpot Deal


One of Britain's biggest insurance companies is drawing up secret plans to cap the pay of its star fund managers after awarding one employee more than £32m over a two-year period.

Sky News has learnt that Prudential is to impose a ceiling on the amount that employees can earn at M&G Investments, the giant asset management group it owns.

The Pru has decided to take the step after handing massive bonuses to Richard Woolnough, a bond fund manager, for 2013 and 2014.

It was unclear at what level the pay cap would be set, or how it would be structured, with both M&G and Prudential declining to comment on Thursday.

Details of the cap are still being finalised, one source said.

However, the limit is expected to apply only to the remuneration of newly employed fund managers at M&G, rather than amendments to the contracts of existing employees.

Sources said there had been some "embarrassment" within Prudential about the £17.5m and £15.3m payouts to Mr Woolnough during the previous two years, although there was no suggestion among insiders that his performance had not merited the awards.

Investors poured billions of pounds into Mr Woolnough's Optimal Income Fund since its launch in 2006, although he will have seen a sharp reduction in his pay award for 2015 after it saw substantial outflows.

Details of his pay cut will be evident in Prudential's annual report when it is published in the coming weeks, although Mr Woolnough is unlikely to be mentioned explicitly.

Under disclosure rules for public companies, Prudential, which owns M&G, has to disclose by name the remuneration packages awarded to board members but not to employees below board level.

Executive directors of public companies already have defined maximum payouts because of the proportion of their salaries which can be paid subsequently in bonuses and long-term share awards.

In practise, their theoretical maximums can still be exceeded because of the value of share options at the point at which they vest; last week, it emerged that Sir Martin Sorrell, the WPP Group chief executive, had received a payout worth over £60m under a share scheme overwhelmingly approved by shareholders.

Mike Wells, who took over as Prudential's group chief executive last year, earned more than £11m in 2014 for his work running its US operation.

Fund managers' pay deals, and the means through which they earn them, have become an increasingly visible target for pay campaigners, with the Institute of Directors among the business groups pressing for a more detailed investigation of the industry.

Prudential insiders have said that Mr Woolnough's pay awards in prior years were justified, pointing to annualised returns for the Optimal Income Fund of 8.19% since its launch in 2006, against a sector average outlined by the Investment Association of 4.7%.

The star manager's other funds include the M&G Strategic Corporate Bond Fund and M&G Corporate Bond Fund, which also manage billions of pounds.

One of the City's top fund managers, Mr Woolnough has a low profile outside the financial sector, having joined M&G after stints at Lloyds Merchant Bank, the Italian insurer Assicurazioni Generali, and SG Warburg.

In 1995, he became a fund manager at Old Mutual, where he also spent almost ten years.

Mr Woolnough's Optimal Income Fund launched in 2006 to provide investors with an alternative to traditional corporate bond funds.

His recent pronouncements to investors include a warning that they "should be less concerned with the EU referendum and focus more on the possibility of Donald Trump as US President".

"The likely impact on UK credit will be noise and uncertainty, but although Brexit fears are likely to cause volatility, a far more important political issue is the US election," he wrote this month.

Earlier this month, Prudential said operatintg profit rose by 22% in 2015 to just over £4bn, although operating profit at M&G slipped by 1% to £442m.

Hugh Hefner Considers Sale Of Playboy Empire


Hugh Hefner's Playboy empire could soon be on the market as reports say the firm is exploring the possibility of a sell-off.

A spokesman for Playboy Enterprises told the AFP news agency it had employed the help of investment bank Moelis & Co to oversee the sale process, confirming an earlier report in the Wall Street Journal.

The company could be worth more than $500m (£354m), although it is hard to know for sure as it is privately owned.

Hefner currently owns around a third of the company and investment firm Rizvi Traverse Management the remaining two thirds.

They took the firm off the stock market in 2011, meaning it no longer has to release financial information.

The potential sale follows an announcement by Playboy magazine last year that it would no longer publish nude photographs in its print editions, saying that the availability of naked images online has made the concept "passe".

The Alliance for Audited Media says the magazine’s circulation has fallen from 5.6 million in 1975 to just 800,000 in 2015.

Its website stopped using fully nude photos in the summer of 2014.

In an attempt to adapt to changing times, the company has shifted its focus towards managing its brand and logo, but in January even the iconic Playboy mansion was listed for sale.

The Los Angeles estate has a $200m (£141m) price tag and comes with a wine cellar, tennis court and zoo licence.

However, a condition of the sale is that current owner Hefner will be able to lease the property for the rest of his life.

Sabtu, 26 Maret 2016

Miner Anglo American To Seek New Finance Boss


The embattled FTSE-100 mining group Anglo American is drawing up plans to replace its veteran finance chief as it pursues a radical restructuring triggered by the rout in global commodity prices.

Sky News has learnt that Anglo is at the early stages of a process to identify a successor to Rene Medori, who has held the role since 2005, making him one of the longest-serving finance chiefs in Britain’s blue-chip share index.

The search for Mr Medori’s successor comes after a torrid period for Anglo as well as rival London-listed mining groups such as BHP Billiton and Glencore, which have been forced to slash their dividends as their profits have slumped.

Anglo is best known for its controlling stake in De Beers, the diamond company.

Last month, Anglo American’s chief executive, Mark Cutifani, outlined plans to shed tens of thousands of jobs by refocusing the company away from bulk commodities such as coal and iron ore.

It wants to sell billions of pounds-worth of mines this year and has said that when its revamp is complete, it will hold just 16 individual assets in copper, diamonds and platinum.

"The global economic environment and its impact on prices have presented the industry with significant challenges during 2015,” Mr Cutifani said in February.

“Against the strong headwinds of a 24% decrease in the basket price of our products for the year as a whole, our ongoing intense focus on operational costs and productivity delivered a [significant earnings] benefit in the year, providing some mitigation.”

No date has yet been set for Mr Medori’s departure from Anglo, and there was no suggestion that shareholders were demanding that he should leave.

Succession is likely to be a broader issue on the agenda for the miner over the next couple of years, with Sir John Parker, its long-serving chairman, expected to make way for a successor.

Last week, Rio Tinto, another FTSE-100 miner, said chief executive Sam Walsh would step down this year.

Anglo American, which now has a market value of just over £7bn, less than half what it was a year ago, declined to comment.

Sponsored By US Economy Boosted By Consumer Spending




US economic growth was higher than expected in the final quarter of 2015.

Gross domestic product (GDP) for the final three months of the year was revised upwards to 1.4% from the 1% initially reported, and against an expected final figure of just 0.7%.

The revised figures published by the Commerce Department show that household spending helped to offset a disappointing performance from businesses in the country, who are feeling the effects of the low price of oil and a strong dollar.

The boost is encouraging news for the country, but is still below the 2% annual growth rate for the July-September quarter.

Consumer spending, which accounts for more than two thirds of economic activity in the US, increased at a pace of 2.4% - above the preliminary figure of 2% which was reported last month.

The good performance is attributed to the rise in employment, which has tightened the labour markets and caused wages to increase.

The low cost of commodities like oil and petrol have also had an effect as households find themselves with more spare money to spend.

An increase in recreational activities and the use of services have particularly contributed to the upward boost.

But the falling oil prices have had the opposite impact on corporations, with profits down 11.5% compared to the same period of 2014 – the biggest annual drop since 2008.

Profits for the year overall were down 5.1%, which is a much bigger decline than the 0.6% drop seen in 2014, and exports were also down at a 2% annual rate.

But despite the weak performance in the business sector the increase in consumer spending could encourage the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates when it meets to make the decision in April.

Last December The Fed voted to raise rates for the first time since June 2006, increasing the rate by 0.25%.


Jumat, 25 Maret 2016

Sponsored By US Economy Boosted By Consumer Spending




US economic growth was higher than expected in the final quarter of 2015.
Gross domestic product (GDP) for the final three months of the year was revised upwards to 1.4% from the 1% initially reported, and against an expected final figure of just 0.7%.

The revised figures published by the Commerce Department show that household spending helped to offset a disappointing performance from businesses in the country, who are feeling the effects of the low price of oil and a strong dollar.

The boost is encouraging news for the country, but is still below the 2% annual growth rate for the July-September quarter.

Consumer spending, which accounts for more than two thirds of economic activity in the US, increased at a pace of 2.4% - above the preliminary figure of 2% which was reported last month.

The good performance is attributed to the rise in employment, which has tightened the labour markets and caused wages to increase.

The low cost of commodities like oil and petrol have also had an effect as households find themselves with more spare money to spend.

An increase in recreational activities and the use of services have particularly contributed to the upward boost.

But the falling oil prices have had the opposite impact on corporations, with profits down 11.5% compared to the same period of 2014 – the biggest annual drop since 2008.

Profits for the year overall were down 5.1%, which is a much bigger decline than the 0.6% drop seen in 2014, and exports were also down at a 2% annual rate.

But despite the weak performance in the business sector the increase in consumer spending could encourage the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates when it meets to make the decision in April.

Last December The Fed voted to raise rates for the first time since June 2006, increasing the rate by 0.25%.


Anger Over Timing Of Land Registry Sale Plan




Ministers have been criticised for setting out controversial plans for privatising the Land Registry shortly before the Easter break.

Under the plans, a private operator would take control of all the main operations of the agency – which registers the ownership of land and property in England and Wales and plays a key role in the property market.

But the Government would retain ownership of the Land Register itself and continue to offer key protections to consumers such as a state-backed guarantee when a loss is incurred as a result of a mistake in the register.

Labour's shadow business secretary Angela Eagle said: "The Government are privatising the profits of the Land Registry whilst retaining the risk.

"This announcement was slipped out late on the last day before recess in another desperate attempt to avoid scrutiny."

She added that the move could undermine confidence in Land Registry data, jeopardise the service it provides to homebuyers and erode conditions for staff.

Public and Commercial Services union general secretary Mark Serwotka called the timing of the proposals "utterly disgraceful".

The 150-year-old agency made a surplus of £100m in 2012/13. Previous reports have estimated its value at £1.2bn. It has around 4,400 staff based at its main office in Croydon and 13 other offices around the country.

Business Secretary Sajid Javid said: "By proposing a model where Government retains critical functions, including ownership of the Register itself, we are delivering on our promise to ensure the sale of public assets benefits the wider economy and all working people in the longer term."

He said the Land Registry could have more freedom in the private sector "to evolve into a high-performing, innovative business, delivering for customers and the wider market in a 21st century digital economy".

The Government said the sale would help pay down debt or enable investment elsewhere. The plans are subject to a consultation that will close on 26 May.

They come after the Coalition considered a privatisation of the agency two years ago, but a campaign was mounted for continued public ownership.

Chancellor George Osborne announced in November that the Government was to consult on moving its operations into private hands from 2017.

Sky News revealed earlier this month that leading buyout firm Advent International – which owns stakes in furniture retailer DFS and payments firm Worldpay – was plotting a takeover of the agency.


Rabu, 23 Maret 2016

Lloyd's Warns On Terror As Profits Dive 30%



Lloyd's, the specialist insurance market, has reported a 30% dip in annual profits to £2.1bn and warned of the need for protection from terrorism "now more than ever".

Lloyd's pointed to a "fast-moving world", with other threats including climate change and cyber crime, in its annual report released just 24 hours after the bomb attacks in Brussels.

It said the financial result for 2015 reflected a "sound market-wide performance despite a turbulent macro-economic backdrop and some of the most challenging market conditions the industry has seen for many years".

Lloyd's cited a fall in investment return to £400m from £1bn in 2014 and pressure on prices.

The market's return on capital fell to 9.1% from 14.1% a year earlier.

Chairman John Nelson said: "In a market undeniably tougher than seen for many years, we have had to demonstrate our ability to adapt and take action.

"In these conditions, these results are creditable".

Lloyd's, which is underwritten by more than 80 syndicates, said it remained focussed on its Vision 2025 plan and expanded market interests in Beijing and Dubai.

But it also pointed to pressure from regulatory obligations and changing technology.

Chief executive Inga Beale said: "Looking across the financial sector, we live in the age of disruptive innovation.

"The breakneck pace of adoption of new technology, changing attitudes towards ways of working, and higher expectations of business ethics are destabilising traditional models."

"Therefore, the importance of innovation and modernisation - to the health of the market and for the benefit of policyholders - cannot be overstated."

She added: "Lloyd's is pursuing its strategy to deliver risk solutions to a fast moving world.

"Business looks to the Lloyd's market to underwrite policies too complex for others to handle. Protection from cyber attacks, terrorism and climate change are needed now more than ever."

She expected market conditions to remain challenging, "providing a climate of reduced levels of returns".

BHS Creditors To Vote On Rent Reduction Plan



Creditors of struggling department store chain British Home Stores (BHS) are to vote today on a survival plan aimed at slashing its rent bill and preventing further store closures.

Retail Acquisitions, which paid billionaire tycoon Sir Philip Green £1 for the loss-making fashion and homewares retailer a year ago, is seeking two company voluntary arrangements (CVAs) that ask those owed money by BHS to accept lower rents.

The business, which currently has 164 stores, is asking landlords to slash rents by up to 50% at 47 of them.

It also argues that rents at a further 40 stores must be cut "substantially" otherwise they are unlikely to survive.

However, BHS has said it will pay rent at current rates on 77 of its "most viable" stores.

A lack of support for the plan would place its future in jeopardy and threaten more than 10,000 jobs - with 8,500 employed directly by BHS.

It has been in the red since the financial crisis - with losses widening to £21m in the financial year before BHS was sold off by Sir Philip.

He had paid £200m for it back in 2000 but it has struggled amid stiff competition and tough trading conditions.

The new owner needs to win the backing of 75% of BHS creditors to secure its turnaround plans.

Sky News revealed earlier this month how it was cutting almost 400 jobs to try to save cash.

Chief executive Darren Topp said on 3 March: "The CVA proposal ... is a necessary milestone in resetting British Home Stores to ensure its long term future as an iconic British retail brand.

"Some of our stores are loss-making as we are being charged rents that are too high relative to today's market.

"Although a difficult process to go through, this sets in motion the comprehensive updated turnaround plan that we have identified, and gives British Home Stores a secure financial footing from which to grow and deliver sustainable profitability."

BHS is also facing a challenge to protect thousands of savers in its pension scheme, which has a deficit of £571m.

The creditor rights of its pension fund have been passed to the Pension Protection Fund (PPF) - an organisation that safeguards pension scheme members if their employer becomes insolvent.

Members are set to receive compensation with those yet to retire on course to net 90% of the value expected.

People already retired are likely to receive the same amount in compensation as they were already drawing, the PPF said.